I ran all 3,145,728 remaining possible outcomes, and here’s a first pass on the percentage of remaining scenarios each team makes the NCAA tournament:
Team | PWR Possibilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | By number of wins | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UND | #1 76.7% #2 23.3% Tournament invites: 100.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mankato | #1 23.3% #2 76.7% Tournament invites: 100.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver | #3 43.6% #4 21.2% #5 12.3% #6 5.1% #7 17.8% Tournament invites: 100.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston University | #3 20.2% #4 27.3% #5 23.6% #6 21.7% #7 7.2% Tournament invites: 100.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MTech | #3 15.8% #4 16.1% #5 15.8% #6 31.0% #7 21.4% Tournament invites: 100.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UMD | #3 3.6% #4 22.3% #5 36.3% #6 27.9% #7 10.0% Tournament invites: 100.0% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miami | #3 16.9% #4 13.1% #5 12.0% #6 14.3% #7 41.8% #8 1.7% #9 0.2% #10 0.0% Tournament invites: 100.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nebraska-Omaha | #8 53.0% #9 36.2% #10 9.7% #11 1.1% Tournament invites: 100.0% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston College | #8 0.0% #9 8.1% #10 24.9% #11 31.8% #12 23.7% #13 9.5% #14 1.8% #15 0.1% Tournament invites: 99.2% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac | #7 0.1% #8 0.3% #9 16.1% #10 12.6% #11 11.1% #12 14.8% #13 20.1% #14 16.2% #15 7.1% #16 1.6% #17 0.1% Tournament invites: 82.5% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SCSU | #7 1.8% #8 21.0% #9 7.4% #10 10.1% #11 13.0% #12 10.4% #13 6.7% #14 6.2% #15 6.2% #16 5.0% #17 5.2% #18 6.0% #19 0.9% #20 0.1% #21 0.0% Tournament invites: 73.1% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bowling Green | #7 0.0% #8 20.9% #9 6.2% #10 5.3% #11 8.7% #12 11.0% #13 13.2% #14 15.7% #15 12.1% #16 5.5% #17 1.3% Tournament invites: 72.6% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UMN | #8 1.0% #9 9.0% #10 10.8% #11 4.6% #12 2.9% #13 5.0% #14 12.9% #15 21.4% #16 17.6% #17 10.8% #18 4.2% Tournament invites: 36.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Providence | #10 1.4% #11 8.7% #12 21.6% #13 30.0% #14 24.7% #15 11.3% #16 2.3% #17 0.0% Tournament invites: 74.6% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harvard | #8 2.1% #9 9.1% #10 8.9% #11 3.8% #12 1.1% #13 1.4% #14 5.1% #15 10.7% #16 16.7% #17 19.2% #18 17.7% #19 3.9% #20 0.3% #21 0.0% Tournament invites: 28.1% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colgate | #9 5.1% #10 10.1% #11 6.9% #12 2.2% #13 0.6% #14 1.4% #15 5.6% #16 7.9% #17 7.6% #18 27.8% #19 15.2% #20 8.5% #21 1.0% Tournament invites: 26.3% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mass.-Lowell | #9 1.9% #10 2.6% #11 5.8% #12 7.1% #13 5.1% #14 2.7% #15 5.4% #16 4.2% #17 5.6% #18 10.2% #19 32.6% #20 15.2% #21 1.5% Tournament invites: 25.7% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yale | #11 0.0% #12 0.4% #13 1.2% #14 3.5% #15 9.2% #16 22.5% #17 37.0% #18 19.8% #19 4.7% #20 1.4% #21 0.2% Tournament invites: 4.1% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vermont | #9 0.6% #10 3.7% #11 4.5% #12 4.9% #13 7.1% #14 9.7% #15 8.5% #16 7.0% #17 6.1% #18 5.6% #19 25.1% #20 15.3% #21 1.8% #22 0.2% #23 0.0% Tournament invites: 27.7% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St. Lawrence | #13 0.0% #14 0.2% #15 2.0% #16 8.9% #17 5.9% #18 6.4% #19 2.0% #20 41.9% #21 23.8% #22 7.3% #23 1.6% #24 0.1% Tournament invites: 25.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michigan | #14 0.0% #15 0.2% #16 0.8% #17 1.2% #18 2.3% #19 9.8% #20 5.4% #21 30.8% #22 25.7% #23 12.2% #24 7.2% #25 3.5% #26 0.8% #27 0.0% Tournament invites: 12.5% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Morris | #19 5.5% #20 8.3% #21 19.5% #22 18.0% #23 15.7% #24 16.8% #25 11.8% #26 3.7% #27 0.6% #28 0.0% Tournament invites: 25.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alaska | #20 0.1% #21 3.2% #22 15.0% #23 31.6% #24 32.9% #25 15.0% #26 2.2% #27 0.1% Tournament invites: 0.0% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northeastern | #19 0.0% #20 3.1% #21 7.1% #22 20.0% #23 24.2% #24 18.3% #25 14.2% #26 9.2% #27 3.7% #28 0.1% Tournament invites: 0.0% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dartmouth | #21 0.1% #22 2.1% #23 9.6% #24 18.0% #25 39.5% #26 23.3% #27 7.2% #28 0.2% Tournament invites: 0.0% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Western Michigan | #20 0.0% #21 0.0% #22 0.5% #23 2.3% #24 6.2% #25 14.4% #26 53.4% #27 21.4% #28 1.7% Tournament invites: 0.0% |
n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Hampshire | #19 0.1% #20 0.4% #21 10.8% #22 11.1% #23 2.6% #24 0.0% #25 0.0% #26 2.8% #27 19.3% #28 10.3% #29 26.7% #30 15.3% #31 0.6% #32 0.0% Tournament invites: 25.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Penn State | #22 0.2% #23 0.3% #24 0.5% #25 1.6% #26 4.4% #27 4.0% #28 5.2% #29 6.4% #30 13.2% #31 15.6% #32 21.7% #33 22.9% #34 4.1% Tournament invites: 12.5% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michigan State | #26 0.2% #27 7.9% #28 12.3% #29 5.8% #30 6.6% #31 14.8% #32 18.5% #33 22.2% #34 11.6% Tournament invites: 25.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ferris State | #28 0.7% #29 14.0% #30 9.2% #31 3.9% #32 8.3% #33 9.8% #34 48.3% #35 5.8% Tournament invites: 25.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ohio State | #33 0.0% #34 5.8% #35 6.7% #36 22.9% #37 23.4% #38 41.1% #39 0.1% Tournament invites: 12.5% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canisius | #35 0.1% #36 16.4% #37 14.8% #38 18.8% #39 37.5% #40 12.4% Tournament invites: 25.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mercyhurst | #36 5.8% #37 10.4% #38 8.8% #39 53.2% #40 20.4% #41 1.4% Tournament invites: 25.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIT | #37 12.5% #38 12.5% #39 9.1% #40 14.6% #41 1.2% #42 0.0% #43 5.7% #44 44.3% Tournament invites: 25.0% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UW | #53 6.7% #54 5.9% #55 87.4% Tournament invites: 12.5% |
|
Who should Gopher fans be rooting for this weekend? Basically as few auto-bid specials as possible?
Yeah, the obvious answers are the most important ones. I cover them in a new article: http://collegehockeyranked.com/2015/03/16/a-look-at-who-can-make-the-tournament-with-less-math/
In short, few auto-bid specials, other bubble teams losing.
There can be some team-specific quirks where you want something a little different because of the head-to-head comparisons, and I’ll start looking into those soon.
Thanks again Jim. You’re the best in the business. Quick question. Did you find that a tie in the NCHC 3rd place game had any quirky outcomes for teams?
Not sure if it’s worth your effort, but I’d also like to see how a third place tie could change things… particularly for SCSU.
I talked a bit about the ties here: http://collegehockeyranked.com/2015/03/17/422/
Bottom line is that it does give SCSU an additional opportunity to advance, particularly because of its interaction with the .500 rule.
Are the %s listed for each team above just % of total scenarios that the team is in or out on? There is no probabilistic aspect of this, right? That’s why teams like UW have a 25% chance of getting in, since there’s a 25% chance of them winning two games if each game has a 50/50 probability?
Correct — share of remaining scenarios, not probability of an outcome.
I can do weighted outcomes, and maybe will later for comparison. Historically, I’ve found that they give a lot less information by overemphasizing the status quo.
USCHO and CHN are also both publishing weighted samples–USCHO’s by crowd-sourcing from people who use its calculator, and CHN through a small number of KRACH-weighted Monte Carlos simulations.
If SCSU loses 3rd place game they’re out automatically due to < .500 record, correct (even though they theoretically could still finish 15th, maybe 14th, in PWR)?
Correct. Two losses pushes them under .500. A loss and a tie puts them right at .500, so eligible. I’m working on a note on the oddities of the potential tie.
Thanks!